<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Online Insider &#187; great thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlineinsider.net/tag/great-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlineinsider.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Great Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineinsider.net/2008/06/29/great-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.onlineinsider.net/2008/06/29/great-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marydee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ala2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elsevier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sciencedirect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlineinsider.net/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elsevier&#8217;s ScienceDirect has an interesting idea. It&#8217;s called For Great Thinking and it&#8217;s very 2.0-ish. The idea is to encourage people to nominate &#34;exceptional individuals&#34; who are doing really good research and &#34;shaping science.&#34; This isn&#8217;t citation analysis, it&#8217;s a wide open invitation to get recognition for scientists who are alive, working in academia, doing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elsevier&#8217;s ScienceDirect has an interesting idea. It&#8217;s called For Great Thinking and it&#8217;s very 2.0-ish. The idea is to encourage people to nominate &quot;exceptional individuals&quot; who are doing really good research and &quot;shaping science.&quot; This isn&#8217;t citation analysis, it&#8217;s a wide open invitation to get recognition for scientists who are alive, working in academia, doing rigorous research, be published, producing original work, making an impact and inspiring others. The categories are: arts and humanities, life sciences and biomedicine, natural sciences, social sciences, engineering, and information technology. So where does library science research go? I asked and the answer was nominate library and information science researchers in whatever category seems to fit best. Then ScienceDirect will sort it out. For the complete rules and to nominate, go<a href="http://www.forgreatthinking.com">here</a>.</p>
<p>And where would <em>you</em> categorize library &amp; information science?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.onlineinsider.net/2008/06/29/great-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
